One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock (SCHOCK trial).
نویسندگان
چکیده
CONTEXT Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of early revascularization (ERV) on 1-year survival for patients with AMI complicated by CS. DESIGN The SHOCK (Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock) Trial, an unblinded, randomized controlled trial from April 1993 through November 1998. SETTING Thirty-six referral centers with angioplasty and cardiac surgery facilities. PATIENTS Three hundred two patients with AMI and CS due to predominant left ventricular failure who met specified clinical and hemodynamic criteria. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned to an initial medical stabilization (IMS; n = 150) group, which included thrombolysis (63% of patients), intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (86%), and subsequent revascularization (25%), or to an ERV group (n = 152), which mandated revascularization within 6 hours of randomization and included angioplasty (55%) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (38%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES All-cause mortality and functional status at 1 year, compared between the ERV and IMS groups. RESULTS One-year survival was 46.7% for patients in the ERV group compared with 33.6% in the IMS group (absolute difference in survival, 13.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2%-24.1%; P<.03; relative risk for death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95). Of the 10 prespecified subgroup analyses, only age (<75 vs >/= 75 years) interacted significantly (P<.03) with treatment in that treatment benefit was apparent only for patients younger than 75 years (51.6% survival in ERV group vs 33.3% in IMS group). Eighty-three percent of 1-year survivors (85% of ERV group and 80% of IMS group) were in New York Heart Association class I or II. CONCLUSIONS For patients with AMI complicated by CS, ERV resulted in improved 1-year survival. We recommend rapid transfer of patients with AMI complicated by CS, particularly those younger than 75 years, to medical centers capable of providing early angiography and revascularization procedures.
منابع مشابه
Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
CONTEXT Cardiogenic shock remains the major cause of death for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Although survival in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI has been shown to be significantly higher at 1 year in those receiving early revascularization vs initial medical stabilization, data demonstrating long-term survival are lacking. OBJECTIVE To det...
متن کاملOne-year survival among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, and its relation to early revascularization: results from the GUSTO-I trial.
BACKGROUND Although 30-day survival is increased in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who undergo coronary revascularization, the longer-term outcome in such patients and the duration of benefit from revascularization are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS We analyzed 30-day survivors of acute myocardial infarction in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase ...
متن کاملEchocardiographic predictors of survival and response to early revascularization in cardiogenic shock.
BACKGROUND Although echocardiography is used in diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction, it has not been established whether specific features of cardiac structure or function early in the course of cardiogenic shock provide prognostic value. The purposes of this substudy of the SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK (SHOCK) trial were to describe...
متن کاملComparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial.
BACKGROUND The Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial demonstrated the survival advantage of emergency revascularization versus initial medical stabilization in patients developing cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. The relative merits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) i...
متن کاملCorrelates of one-year survival inpatients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: angiographic findings from the SHOCK trial.
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to describe the core laboratory angiographic findings of "SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK" (SHOCK) trial participants and to determine the relationship of angiographic parameters to one-year survival. BACKGROUND In the SHOCK trial, emergency revascularization improved one-year survival of patients with cardioge...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Indian heart journal
دوره 53 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001